In a recent case out of California, a state appellate court found that an employee’s inability to work for a particular supervisor due to boss-related stress and anxiety did not constitute a disability under state law. The employee worked for her employer for approximately three years before being diagnosed by her doctor with adjustment disorder
Discrimination & Harassment
Should You Have an Anti-Bullying Policy in Your Workplace?
This post was contributed by Paul Ritchey, a Summer Associate with McNees Wallace and Nurick LLC. Mr. Ritchey is a law student at the University of Virginia School of Law and is expected to earn his J.D. in May 2016.
We have seen it before: boss shouts (or glares, or laughs) at subordinate, and subordinate’s…
Supreme Court: Motive Matters in Hiring Decisions
This post was contributed by Matthew Garber, a Summer Associate with McNees Wallace and Nurick LLC. Mr. Garber is a law student at Rutgers University School of Law – Camden and is expected to earn his J.D. in May 2016.
Last week, in EEOC. v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., the Supreme Court…
Five Ways the EEOC Proposed Wellness Regulations Would Change Workplace Health Initiatives
Background
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) generally prohibits employers from requiring current employees to submit to medical examinations or medical inquiries unless the exam or inquiry is “job-related and consistent with business necessity.” Guidance issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in 2000 makes an exception to this rule for wellness programs that…
New OFCCP Regulations Protecting LGBT Workers Now In Effect
As you may recall, last July, President Obama signed an Executive Order prohibiting federal contractors and subcontractors from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. While many large federal contractors already ban sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination (as well as a number of states and municipalities), there is no Pennsylvania or…
ADA Claim Brought by Claustrophobic Attorney Allowed to Proceed
This post was contributed by Adam L. Santucci, an Attorney in McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC’s Labor & Employment Practice Group in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
When the Americans with Disabilities Act definition of “disability” was expanded by the ADA Amendments Act of 2008, we told you to expect an increase in accommodation requests and disability…
A Game-Changing Misstep for Walmart?
A federal district court recently sanctioned Walmart for “spoliation of evidence” in an employment litigation case. Although Walmart has asked the Court to reconsider its decision or allow it to appeal the decision to the appellate court, there’s an important lesson to be learned regardless of the outcome: Mind Your Rs & Ds. In other words, pay attention to your company’s retention and destruction of, well, everything employment-related, particularly if there is reason to suspect that litigation is a possibility.
Continue Reading A Game-Changing Misstep for Walmart?
President Obama Signs Executive Order Prohibiting Federal Contractors from Discriminating Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
Frustrated with Congress’s failure to pass the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) and consistent with his recent Executive Order to raise the minimum wage to $10.10 for employees of federal contractors, President Obama once again signed an Executive Order on Monday amending Executive Order 11246 to include “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” in the list of protected classes federal contractors may not discriminate against.
Continue Reading President Obama Signs Executive Order Prohibiting Federal Contractors from Discriminating Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
EEOC Issues New Enforcement Guidance on Pregnancy Discrimination
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently released updated enforcement guidance on pregnancy discrimination to help employers comply with both the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) when addressing pregnancy-related issues.
Continue Reading EEOC Issues New Enforcement Guidance on Pregnancy Discrimination
Can Telecommuting Be a Reasonable Accommodation under the ADA?
Last month, in EEOC v. Ford Motor Company, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals (covering Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, and Michigan) held for the first time that employers may be required to permit employees to telecommute as a reasonable accommodation for a disability. While the decision is not binding on employers in the Third Circuit (covering Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware), the case is significant for employers within the Sixth Circuit’s jurisdiction and beyond as it clearly signals a willingness to expand the traditional concept of what constitutes an employer’s “workplace” as modern technology continues to evolve.
Continue Reading Can Telecommuting Be a Reasonable Accommodation under the ADA?